Talk:Doom Mons

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Doctorphoebe in topic Questions about sources

Questions about sources edit

Hello! I'd want to ask, if you are sure that this and this sources say about Doom Mons, not some other mountains? These sources were published on December 12 and 13, 2006, and Doom Mons was imaged by Cassini on 22 February and 10 April 2007. And about this source — does it really say that "Doom Mons is believed to be a twin-peak that rises over a mile above the relatively flat surrounding plain, and a possible massive cryovolcano, but its exact nature of formation is unknown"? Stas (talk) 00:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to add that the citation "8" mentions nothing about the information it's liked with: "The superficial features of Doom Mons are constantly changing, a fact which may be exacerbated by a sub-surface, briny ocean.[8] " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6025:0:4588:5722:7341:C308 (talk) 07:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This whole article is out of date. The highest peak on Titan is in Mithras Mons at 3,337 meters (10,984 feet). Doom Mons is not even in the top one million peaks in the solar system. Doctorphoebe (talk) 03:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doom Mons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply