Talk:DontStayIn

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Nick Cooper in topic tagging for sources

If you don't think this site is big enough, please check the stats listed. Nobility is asserted through these and the external links, so this page cannot qualify for speedy deletion. If you don't think it meets our criteria, take it to AFD instead. exolon 18:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I rewrote the article for a more factual/neutral tone so will remove the tag. Exxolon 22:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Original research/Citations needed edit

I have just added links for evidence supporting the "biggest ever flashmob" assertion and also the "users commenting favourably" statement and removed the Or|date=January 2008 and Fact|date=January 2008 tags Resag (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Awards edit

Added in awards that DSI have won over the time. I have tried to reference these however have not found anything that can be cited. There is record though of the awards being won in the forums of DSI, though, and the various trophys are on display in the DSI offices. Geebob (talk) 13:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on DontStayIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DontStayIn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

tagging for sources edit

With this edit I added several tags where sources were needed, which @Nick Cooper undid with a comment labeling the tagging "spurious" and suggesting I'd removed legitimate sources. I have undone that revert in the interest of encouraging communication. It's really not appropriate to remove a challenge, such as a citation-needed tag, without reaching consensus among editors. ~TPW 13:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your edits replaced multiple existing sources with "citation needed" tags, or you spuriously tagged them as "self published," which they are clealry not within the meaning of WP:SPS. For example, the 2005 documentary is supported by DSI itself, the broadcaster's website, and the production company's website. These are, of course, now deadlinks, but the archived versions on IA had already been added for the first two, and the third is easily found. Stuff doesn't cease to be true, just because the webpages detailing it have changed or closed, especially given that IA is an accepted method of referencing them. And, seriously, do you really need to ask for a source to "prove" that DontStayIn was commonly abbreviated to "DSI"? GMAFB... Nick Cooper (talk) 16:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply