Talk:Donorovyn Lümbengarav

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Latebird in topic The man's name

The man's name edit

This is confusing. If, as the hatnote says, Donorov is his given name AND is the name by which he should be referred, with Lumbengarav being only a patronymic, then

  • Why is the patronymic written first in the article title and in the text?
  • Why is the patronymic written first especially given that it comes second in the Mongolian version of his name, given as Доноровын Лхүмбэнгарав?
  • Why are there a fair number of web pages out there that list him as "Д Лхүмбэнгарав"?

Can someone please sort this out?—Largo Plazo (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. Should now be correct in accordance with WP:MON (the creator of this article appears to have been as much confused as you were by his creation...). --Latebird (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply