Talk:Don Gault/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Wizardman
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with the other FAs)
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done Cross-checked with the other FAs: Art Houtteman, Orval Grove, Nick Adenhart, Scott Zolak, Harmon Killebrew, Rogers Hornsby, Thurman Tucker, Stan Coveleski & Bob Feller
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with the other FAs: Art Houtteman, Orval Grove, Nick Adenhart, Scott Zolak, Harmon Killebrew, Rogers Hornsby, Thurman Tucker, Stan Coveleski & Bob Feller
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images (None)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
I think the layout needs to be fixed.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 12:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Do you have a suggestion where to put the personal life info? I hate having that section in articles myself so I'm entirely fine getting rid of it, I've just tried and failed in making it work inside the article without it seeming jarring (I was also hoping to find later info on him so I could just use it as a post-career section, but no luck there). Wizardman 14:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I guess it will go better if you remove it. I'm usually reluctant when it comes to deleting any relevant content. But it's a BLP and his wife is not notable. Also, we are discouraged to include personal info in a BLP in order to ensure privacy. So I'd not prefer devoting a Heading 2 to personal life with a very short paragraph because it will stand out in the article, but if you find later info on him, please feel free to restore the content. That's the best advice I can give. But really, I'm willing to rely on your experience as a reviewer. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, especially since there's nothing more recent on marriage or children, at best the source used is archaic. Removed that and merged the other note into his career. Wizardman 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fair enough, especially since there's nothing more recent on marriage or children, at best the source used is archaic. Removed that and merged the other note into his career. Wizardman 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- I guess it will go better if you remove it. I'm usually reluctant when it comes to deleting any relevant content. But it's a BLP and his wife is not notable. Also, we are discouraged to include personal info in a BLP in order to ensure privacy. So I'd not prefer devoting a Heading 2 to personal life with a very short paragraph because it will stand out in the article, but if you find later info on him, please feel free to restore the content. That's the best advice I can give. But really, I'm willing to rely on your experience as a reviewer. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)