Talk:Doms in Iraq

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romani people, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romani people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Romani peopleWikipedia:WikiProject Romani peopleTemplate:WikiProject Romani peopleRomani people articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Iraq Mid‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article identical with another source? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just to let you know:
The exacly same article is published in another online encyclopedia's page: Nationmaster: Qawliya.
This is maybe just a formality, but I'd concider it better for the credibility of both sites that the articles would be different - or at least showing openly their connection.
If this is just a matter of editing this article, I would recommend doing so.
If this article has been wrongly utilised by other company, I have contacted the Wikipedia on the matter. Cheers!
Tucmo (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The text at the bottom of the page (at the other article) links back here. This is GFDL compliant. John Reaves 16:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations??? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article is largely unsourced, especially the last additions. If nobody can't bring sources to sustain the claims, I say that we delete them, as there are already plenty obscure infos on "gypsies". Kenshin (talk) 09:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not only is it unsourced, it clearly demonstrates a bias and the language is very prejudiced with assertions that "they lied about their appeal to get a passport." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.142.56.191 (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll start cleaning up. Kenshin (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic