Talk:Dominica at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will be reviewing this article as part of a GAN sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • Specificy what specific events Duranona and Thea LaFond partook in the lead. --  Done

Background

edit
  • "(1 athlete per sex)" – The number 1 should be spelt out per MOS:NUMERAL --  Done
  • Durañona was selected as the flag bearer for both the opening and closing ceremony – closing ceremonies --  Done and shortened the link

Athletics (track and field)

edit
  • The first instance of Duranona should have the ñ in place of the first ordinary n --  Done
  • Wikilink wildcard to Wild card (sports) as you have done in the lead --  Done
  • In the key mini-section, all notes bar the first one should be removed since they are not used in the article --Looks good?

References

edit
  • All content is accurately and reliably sourced

Overall a good effort has been made and does not go off topic. On hold until all the above issues have been resolved. MWright96 (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Should all be fixed. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@DatGuy: The notes bar looks much better and these improvements merit this article's promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply