Talk:Dominica at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments

This is not a formal review, Dom497 is doing it. The article is very interesting, even though that is not a criteria for passage. Auchansa (talk) 04:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm wondering about the little symbols used on some of the section headings. Don't think that's allowed per MoS:Section headings: "Headings should not contain images, including flag icons." MathewTownsend (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

@Auchansa: Can you please clarify what you are trying to say? @MathewTownsend: I guess not.--Dom497 (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

What I am saying is that I like the article. I haven't gone through all the technical criteria but Dom497 is doing that. I am just saying that the general readability and way it interests the reader is there. Good work, whoever wrote it.Auchansa (talk) 04:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Hm. I've noticed many Olympics articles have had these images. I think that there may have been some decision within the Olympic WikiProject at one point to incorporate those images into all the headers. I'll ask around. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 20:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I made some changes to the article but other than that, nothing else needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)