This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion
Please share your thoughts here on the merge.Ohyeahmormons 19:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Support - he's a minor character, just a member of Jimbo's gang, Kearney (Simpsons) is proposed to merge also... - Adolphus79 06:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Support - For reasons stated on Kearney's talk page.Ohyeahmormons 13:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Although I may be in favor of merging all 3 of them (Dolph, Kearney, and Jimbo) into one article and renaming it (with their names redirecting to that article. --Ted87 15:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Dolph must have an own page, he's NOT "just a memeber of Jimo's gang"
Oppose They are separate characters and I agree he isn't "just a member of Jimo's gang" All systems go 19:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oppose In any school gang there are always some characters quieter than others. Dolph has a presence and character of his own, although it would be nice to 'find out' a little more about him (or it would have been if The Simpsons hadn't been so appallingly shite since Series 10. If ever a show has gone from being so brilliant to so poor....) Martyn Smith 18:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oppose More and more, Dolph is becoming a character all his own. It's only a matter of time before there's an episode centered around him, and I'm looking forward to it! Dolphers 21:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
