Talk:Dolmabahçe Palace

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fk219.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Ataturk's Death

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was in Dolmabahce Palace in his last days and his death. The room he died in has a memorial section and its a place of major importance in his death anniversaries. I think thisn should be mentioned in the artickle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.108.203.68 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 September 2005.

It's in the article now. Atilim Gunes Baydin 16:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Plan

It would be great if someone could add a plan to this article. Seaaron 15:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Amount of gold used on ceilings

I am not in a position to change it as I don't know what the source is, but the number seems overly inflated. At generally accepted weight of gold leaf, one square meter is 2 grams. Fourteen tons would cover area of 7 square kilometers. I know the palace is large, I've had an opportunity to see it's glory, but it seems a bit too much considering that not all ceilings are gilded. Vshioshvili (talk) 15:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Why have you changed "History" section? Or did you think that it is not wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustafa Bakacak (talk • contribs) 17:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I wait answer from everyone.--Mustafa Bakacak (talk) 20:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I also translate in case the article is a featured article. --Mustafa Bakacak (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Area of ceilings is stated at 10,000 sq metres gilded. 1 troy ounce of gold leaf will cover about 30 sq.m. (very conservatively). Heavy gold leaf will still cover 10 sq m per oz troy. Each ton has about 32,500 oz. troy and would thus cover about 1 million sq. m.. What is far more likely is that the cost of the gold leaf and all the gilding work had a total value of 14 tons of gold. Even then, it is difficult to see how it could cost that much unless defense contractors bid on the job. :) Collect (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

The reference says: "14 tonnes of gold was used only to adorn the interior ceiling of the palace." Perhaps, they mean not only gilding? Could there be some pieces made completely of gold? BTW, where did you find this number, 10000m2? And in general, I can imagine, the contractors were very "generous" in their material calculations. ;) --Off-shell (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Easy number to check - [1] covers a lot of sources. Gilding is thicker, but many of the ceilings are mainly covered with paintings. Collect (talk) 13:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Largest palace in Turkey?

The statement "Dolmabahçe is the largest palace in Turkey." opening the Design and layout section is at least questionable. The following sentence quotes a surface of 45,000 m2. In the same city of Istanbul the Topkapı Palace according the the corresponding wikipedia page has a size 592,600 to 700,000 m2, many times larger. So Dolmabahçe is at least second in size, but other palaces of larger size may be sitting around Turkey as well, without us knowing.

So, I'll delete that "largest palace" sentence in a a few days unless someone comes up with a clear explanation for it. Nicola.Manini (talk) 11:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

It looks like the numbers quoted for Topkapı include the courtyards, while its buildings are much smaller. In contrast, Dolmabahçe is a monoblock building. It needs to be checked carefully in sources what is really meant by these numbers before deleting this statement. --Off-shell (talk) 22:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dolmabahçe Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717084800/http://www.istanbul.net.tr/istanbul_muzeler_detay.asp?id=103 to http://www.istanbul.net.tr/istanbul_muzeler_detay.asp?id=103
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124082508/http://www.dolmabahce.gov.tr:80/source.cms.docs/dolmabahce.gov.tr.ce/dolmabahce.html to http://www.dolmabahce.gov.tr/source.cms.docs/dolmabahce.gov.tr.ce/dolmabahce.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)