Talk:Dolibarr

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

The software links to in 'Comparison of accounting software', but is not mentioned as relevant software in this article. I miss some passion behind this software, it is not so hard, as this software has much potential to win. As George Zalucki says: 'Take it to heart, than act upon it.' Very thank you to the contributors of Dolibarr. Please add some accountancy capabilities (including professional human resources management), this would support me much.

- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qlm0nky (talk • contribs) 03:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, on 9. August 2012 I created a talk page complaining of the deletion of the entry Dolibarr. It seems that just a few hours later the talk page has been deleted. Well, and Wikipedia is asking, why the members are runing away? As I wrote before Dolibarr is popular open source ERP/CRM system, especially in France with over 65'000 downloads on sourceforge ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/dolibarr/files/stats/timeline?dates=2012-01-01+to+2012-08-09 ) only in the first 8 Months of 2012!! I don't question, that the quality of the article could have been raised, but to just delete it and to question notablility?? At least let there be an open discussion about it, please? That should be the least possible in an open society. 37.243.129.32 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

-

After talking with admin user making the deletion (done because of the PROD tag added several month ago on page), page was restored (talks available on page [User_talk:Mark_Arsten]). If you still find things that are not compliant with wikipedia rules, please add a note on my talk page. I will do my best to fix them. --Eldy (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dolibarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003043734/http://www.fcvnet.net/~cma80.fr/packCreateur/actualites.html to http://www.fcvnet.net/~cma80.fr/packCreateur/actualites.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic