![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhat grounds are there for stating this is nonsense? It is a clear disambig page. — Tivedshambo (t|c) 11:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Please understand, I am more intelligent than you. It is clearly not notable, and my interpretation of the non-notable policy trumps anything you can muster sir. Please, I beseech you, stand down and allow your intellectual superior handle this! Only I fully grasp the notability policy, despite knowing nothing of the subject matter! Druge (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose deletion I've just patrolled this page, and consider it to be a perfectly acceptable disambiguation page. Druge, please be WP:CIVIL. Mjroots (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Clearly this is a sensible disambig page. Speedy declined. And I agree with Mjroots - Druge please comment on content not contributors. Pedro : Chat 11:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)