Talk:Dogwood (band)

Two Bands named Dogwood?

I know of a Christian band named Dogwood, who put out an album in 1981 called Journey. Is this the same band?

Never mind, after listening to excerpts of their music, I'm pretty sure they are not the same band.

No, they are not the same band. I wonder why there isn't an article for the real Dogwood, formed in the early 1970s by Steve Chapman and Ron Elder and one of the important early contemporary Christian bands. Holford 03:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Added reference to disambiguation page. Ready for someone to create the page from there. Please feel free to help with that. - KitchM (talk) 01:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Ridiculous move

Some fool has turned Dogwood into a disambiguation page, in order to accomodate some punk band in LA. Thus ever reference to a dogwood will have to be linked as Dogwood 9plant). Too many twelve-year olds at Wikipedia. --16:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

We have some quick flamers here at Wikipedia, I guess! Dogwood (the band) is a very influential Christian punk band, and frankly I'm surprised that there was no entry for it. I'm in the process of fleshing out the Dogwood band node as well as fixing the links. Calm down, and please refrain from the personal attacks. Jpers36 17:20, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sean O'Donnell

is this the same sean o'donnell? it links to a hockey player. i'm guessing they're different people. --preschooler@heart my talk - contribs 01:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Matt Aragon

I've checked quite a few places, including Amazon.com and mp3.com, and they list the release date of Dogwood's album Matt Aragon as 9-25-2001. On this page it lists it as 2002. Anyone know which is correct?

I've also wondered why the article states Matt Aragon being released in 2001 as even Tooth & Nail, which was their former record label, states on their website that it was released in September 2001 (although the date says it was the 13th rather than the 25th). I think it's safe to say if it states 2001 on the record labels site, it should be changed to that. Furik 12:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite

This article seriously needs to be completely revamped...

Not pioneers in christian punk rock

They are not "one of first bands to express both their punk rock musical influences and their Christian personal beliefs". Even page on christian punk will tell you that the genre really began in the early 80's. If Dogwood began in '93, they are obviously nowhere near one of the first and certainly are not "pioneers of their genre" (if christian punk is the genre). The second sentence of the first paragraph needs to be completely rewritten to exclude the mistake. I will let someone else rewrite, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.30.31 (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I thought the same thing, and even other Wikipedia articles confirm that this claim is incorrect. Mingusboodle (talk) 00:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

This seems to be their claim to notability. Are there RS that they are notable? RJFJR (talk) 17:52, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Multiple releases on Tooth & Nail should be sufficient for notability (WP:BAND #5) Dl2000 (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Are they still active?

Are they still active? RJFJR (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dogwood (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060519160426/http://www.indievisionmusic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1265 to http://www.indievisionmusic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1265
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hmmagazine.com/issue74/74Albums.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)