Wikipedia

Talk:Dog Day Afternoon/Archive 2

< Talk:Dog Day Afternoon
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

References to use

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
  • Biber, Katherine (2007). Captive Images: Race, Crime, Photography. Routledge-Cavendish. pp. 40–42. ISBN 978-0-415-42039-6.
  • Bookbinder, Robert (1982). The Films of the Seventies. Citadel Press. ISBN 978-0-8065-0790-3.
  • Corkin, Stanley (2011). "Policing the unsafe city: The French Connection (1971), Serpico (1973), and Dog Day Afternoon (1975), Prince of the City (1981)". Starring New York: Filming the Grime and the Glamour of the Long 1970s. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-538280-8.
  • Jameson, Fredric (1992). "Class and Allegory in Contemporary Mass Culture: Dog Day Afternoon as a Political Film (1977)". Signatures of the Visible. Routledge. pp. 35–54. ISBN 978-0-415-90012-6.
  • Also: Jameson, Fredric (2000). "Class and Allegory in Contemporary Mass Culture: Dog Day Afternoon as a Political Film (1977)". In Hardt, Michael; Weeks, Kathi (eds.). The Jameson Reader. Blackwell Readers. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 288–307. ISBN 978-0-631-20270-7.
  • Lumet, Sidney (1996). Making Movies. Vintage. ISBN 978-0-679-75660-6.
  • Morrison, James (2010). Hollywood Reborn: Movie Stars of the 1970s. Star Decades. Rutgers University Press. pp. 62–63, 69–80. ISBN 978-0-8135-4749-7.
  • Rapf, Joanna E., ed. (2005). Sidney Lumet: Interviews. Conversations With Filmmakers Series. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1-57806-724-4.
  • Sarris, Andrew (1978). "Dog Day Afternoon". Politics and Cinema. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-04034-1.
  • Tait, R. Colin (2008). "Politics, Class and Allegory in Spike Lee's Inside Man". In Hamlet, Janice D.; Coleman, Robin R. Means (eds.). Fight the Power!. Peter Lang. pp. 41–60. ISBN 978-1-4331-0236-3. (references Dog Day Afternoon)
  • Vankin, Jonathan; Whalen, John (2005). "Dog Day Afternoon". Based on a True Story*: Fact and Fantasy in 100 Favorite Movies. Chicago Review Press. pp. 149–152. ISBN 978-1-55652-559-9.

Featured article?

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

I hate to say this, but this article doesn't seem like a featured one at all, considering the fact that this page only has 22 references and 7 external links. In fact, this looks more like a C article if you ask me. Now, I've looked at other ones, such as Fight Club (1999) and Halloween (1978), and have noticed these articles are well-written and sourced, i.e. Writing, Casting, Music, Reception etc. Correct me if I'm wrong, but does anyone here have any thoughts about this or am I the only one here? — Arbero 19:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC).

  • As the original author from ages ago I would tend to agree. I would not be surprised if this faced de-listing if nominated at FARC. Staxringold talkcontribs 17:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Reviewing the FAC page for the article, there was not a high level of scrutiny at the time. Since then, the FAC process has become more stringent. For example, a recent Featured Article is American Beauty (film), which is tremendously comprehensive. I recommend posting this article for a featured article review. Message me on my talk page if one of you decides to do this. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Erik's right, that the level of comprehensiveness required has risen since 2006. That said, there's no biased or poor quality content here, it just needs more. There's a few good editors here, would anyone be interested in a collaboration to improve it? --Ktlynch (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I can try to help, but a lot of useful information is going to be found in print sources. If you have access to a library, I can research for references to use and list them here. I have access but no travel time to follow up. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Good work on accumulating references Erik, I hope to be in a research library in the next week and hopefully I'll have time to look at some of them. At least, there's some good sources ready to go. --Ktlynch (talk) 00:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Maybe work in a mention of Cuckoo's Nest?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I couldn't figure out an appropriate way to work it in, but when a much-nominated film loses in several categories, it's useful to the reader to know what competition it was up against. In nearly all categories in which DDA lost, it lost to One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (also losing Film Editing to Jaws and Supporting Actor to gee-I-already-forgot-even-though-I-just-looked-it-up). If someone can write a good sentence about that, it'd be a handy minor addition to the comprensiveness of the article. Lawikitejana (talk) 00:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Penny Allen link leads to incorrect info

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Penelope Allen plays the mother of Pacino's son in Scarecrow. She would next appear as the head teller of the bank that Pacino robs in Dog Day Afternoon.

Methinks this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_Allen is the wrong Penny Allen johncheverly 16:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I fixed the link. Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 17:04, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Dog Day Afternoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dog Day Afternoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Plot too long?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Anything wrong with the current state of the Plot section? The film is complicated when I watched the film several or more years ago. --George Ho (talk) 07:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dog Day Afternoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dog_Day_Afternoon/Archive_2&oldid=1008467655"