Talk:Dnyanmata Vidyalaya, Sangamner

Sources

I've twice checked 6 pages of Google references (about 60 references) and found none better than the two I've included with this article. I can find no more independent references that would satisfy Wiki criteria. Given the nature of the school it seems to me that a "sensible" conclusion (as suggested by Wiki) is that it minimally satisfies Wiki criteria and the tag is of no benefit to anyone. The stub tag seems to me to be quite sufficient.@Devopam:Jzsj (talk) 12:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@Jzsj:, I didn't tag this article for deletion in good faith because it is an educational institution. The two references are WP:Primary and hence practically there is no reference cited. Hope to see some relevant reference in future and the tag to be removed subsequently. Devopam (talk) 12:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@Devopam:It's true that it's extremely short on references. Perhaps you can explain where one goes to remove the ugly tag? There are no great claims in the article. Also, I think the Pune Jesuits who are not directly involved in the school can be considered the favored "secondary source", according to the description: "A secondary source provides an author's own thinking based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains an author's analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Secondary sources are not necessarily independent or third-party sources." Jzsj (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)