Talk:Dmitry Shemyaka
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Arbitrarily0 in topic Requested move 24 February 2023
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note
editIt seems that [1] mentions another title "Shemyaka's Justice". I will check in Russian sources. Lom Konkreta (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 24 February 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus Arbitrarily0 (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Dmitry Shemyaka → Dmitrii Shemiaka – WP:COMMONNAME according to a Google Books Ngram chart.[2] For four decades this spelling has been more commonly used than the next two put together,[3] from 50% to 85% of total usage.[4] —Michael Z. 23:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, the difference is insignificant. Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- 1) If it is insignificant, then why oppose the change mandated by the guideline? 2) Lately you opposed a number of similar changes because you thought they were destructive, “pure disruption”[5] (“massively”),[6] and comprising a “crusade.”[7][8][9][10] Why don’t you tell us what you really think? —Michael Z. 00:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think you are net negative in this topic area and should be topic banned, do you want me to repeat this every time I oppose your disruptive nomination? The change is not mandated by any guideline, you are just on a crusade against WP:RUS as you yourself said in the past. Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your honesty. You are on a crusade against me, as you have said in the past and are openly saying now. I think you should cease and desist from targeting me with your disruption. —Michael Z. 09:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think you are net negative in this topic area and should be topic banned, do you want me to repeat this every time I oppose your disruptive nomination? The change is not mandated by any guideline, you are just on a crusade against WP:RUS as you yourself said in the past. Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- 1) If it is insignificant, then why oppose the change mandated by the guideline? 2) Lately you opposed a number of similar changes because you thought they were destructive, “pure disruption”[5] (“massively”),[6] and comprising a “crusade.”[7][8][9][10] Why don’t you tell us what you really think? —Michael Z. 00:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.