Talk:Dmitry Rybolovlev

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MarioGom in topic Undisclosed paid edits

NPOV? edit

"In 1995, Rybolovlev took another difficult decision which - with hindsight – also proved to be a wise one" --Test35965 (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This entire article is fraught with NPOV violations; it reads like a PR release. I'd love it if someone could spend a couple of hours with the "delete" button and prune out all of the adulatory language. Bricology (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I tried to clean the article up... but there is still a need to a) patrol it for fresh addition of sole-purpose accounts and b) to check for facts and add information from unbiased reliable sources! noclador (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm pretty shocked at the obvious slant and "press release" quality of this Wikipedia entry. This article exemplifies many of the criticisms of the weaknesses and quality problems of the online encyclopedia. How this guy get away with a soft-focus hagiography here is baffling to me. Someone needs to re-do this.forestflyer (talk) 05:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dmitry Rybolovlev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

connections with Donald J. Trump edit

Why is there nothing about his well publicized links with Donald J. Trump? At a minimum, it is worth pointing out that he bought a property from DJT for more than $50 million more than its market value, and his documented habit of flying his private plane to the same airports as DJT on the same dates ought to be mentioned too.--74.103.157.38 (talk) 00:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

North Carolina Alevo Manufacturing edit

Need coverage in article.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article168094632.html

Trump-linked oligarch’s company goes bust as intrigue grows

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/article167970747.html

Russian-backed battery maker Alevo filing for bankruptcy, laying off 290 in Concord

".....The Russian billionaire’s luxury jet also generated international intrigue when it landed in Charlotte in November on the same day then-candidate Trump was making a presidential campaign appearance. After some speculation about the visit, a spokesman confirmed that Rybolovlev was in the area for Alevo meetings, not to meet with Trump...."

"


Why was none of this background in the article? Dumbfounded, --Wikipietime (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

I reverted three modifications by accounts 107.85.255.46, Token mur and Blur Road, on account of vandalism (in accordance with WP:VD). The accounts seem to have been created for this purpose, without user pages or activity since their creation and modifications on this page. I'd suggest that if these moves persist, the page should be semi-protected to prevent non-auto-confirmed accounts from editing this page.

TertiusGaudens (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi TertiusGaudens.

The entire section I wrote has been covered extensively in many well-known US and foreign media, such as MSNBC and Business Insider. I did not make up anything. Please judge my contributions on facts, not on some hidden motives that you assume I have.

You accuse me of vandalism, could you please elaborate on this. As a reminder, here is the official definition of vandalism on Wikipedia:

On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge. The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia.

Please show me exactly in what I wrote where I "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge".

Thanks --Token mur (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

AS Monaco edit

This section needs a rework. This article is NOT about AS Monaco, too many non-Rybolovlev informations have been included. Cheers 217.149.173.81 (talk) 08:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid edits edit

I have added an {{undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icomefromfaraway for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Icomefromfaraway (talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. There are also older sockpuppets in the history of this article that have not been blocked because of their long inactivity. Undisclosed paid editing here dates back to, at least, 2018. MarioGom (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply