Talk:Districts of Pakistan

Link rot

Of the 5 External Links, all but one (the 4th) are dead.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

@Solomonfromfinland: Thanks for highlighting this. I have updated all the links and done some other fixes. Green Giant (edits) (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Districts of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.arcpakistan.org/html/cyclone/AssessmentReport.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140716164102/http://census.gov.pk/datacensus.php to http://www.census.gov.pk/datacensus.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Page needs updating with 2017 district level census results

I've edited the FATA region as it was the shortest (I'm lazy)

But would be glad to see if someone can add the whole census results. Also, is it necessary to include the 1998 data or is it better to remove it? Or should be made into a seperate table for later perusal?

Cheers! Paranoid-Penguin (talk) 23:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paranoid-Penguin (talk • contribs) 23:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC) 

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Districts of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C01%5C20%5Cstory_20-1-2011_pg1_8
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151124220156/http://pakobserver.net/201303/24/detailnews.asp?id=201427 to http://pakobserver.net/201303/24/detailnews.asp?id=201427

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Districts of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109092219/http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/26-Oct-2008/Commissionerate-system-restored to http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/26-Oct-2008/Commissionerate-system-restored

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Nonsense Edits

First of all, the URDU word for District is ZILLAH (ضلع)...I have never heard of any term called "IZLAA" in my life. Second of all, districts form the 3rd-level of administrate divisions in Pakistan. Divisions are still intact, but hold no governing power. All the provinces have reverted power over to the DISTRICT...that doesn't mean the district becomes the 2nd-level...the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics still uses divisions for demographic purposes. See Divisions of Pakistan which I edited. Lastly, I don't see the point of making such a mess in the introduction. Keep it simple. Districts are 3rd-level administrative units and 1st-tier of local government. In total their are 156 districts in Pakistan. You don't need to have a large paragraph making a mess. --HudairaViki (talk) 18:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

First off, your comment is littered with personal attacks, you do not have to describe others edits as nonsense. Secondly, all Wikipedia Project Pakistan pages are formatted that way, you do write complete title name in Urdu. Moreover, if you never heard اضلاع, then please copy/paste it into this and you will find out, it means Districts. Your other changes to the lead regarding second, third or first level of government are controversial. Please discuss, gain consensus and then you can make those changes. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

I second what Sheriff said above. Please discuss intstead of engaging in edit wars. Saqib (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi NadirAli. I actually really don't understand. In my opinion it just boils down to arrogance? The Urdu translation of "District" is written wrong. I keep changing it to the correct term "Zillah", but the Sheriff continues reverting it. I really don't get it...it's beyond my comprehension. If you look at the last two edit histories you'll see my version and the version Sheriff continues to revert back too. Just for the record, I've also made corrections to Divisions of Pakistan in my bid to correct the Local government in Pakistan articles. I began with Divisions and now continuing with Districts. I think its imperative that the introductions be as simple as possible and that the translations be basic. There's no need to translate "Districts of Pakistan" into Urdu...simply referring to them as "Zillah" is suffice. --HudairaViki (talk) 17:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello [[Sheriff bhai, what is your take on this? If you have a differing Urdu transition, then I suggest we add that in. I've done that on another article. Let me know if that works for you, I can re-write it to accommodate both, provide they are both valid translations. Patiently awaiting your response while I attend to other matters.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

I do not understand HudairaViki's insistence as to why we should translate "District" singularly and not the complete article title. We are not obligated to keep things simple as they suggest for their personal preference, we ought to keep things correct and correct we will keep. I am okay with completely removing Urdu translation to remove the bone of contention but if we are keeping it then we are keeping the correct translation. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Khyber Pakhtunkhwa District.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Locations of districts don't match between pages

So across the Pakistan pages the location of the districts do not match. I think (though I am largely ignorant on the subject) that this page is where the mistakes are. For example if you look at the table (and accompanying image) of Balochistan it shows that the Sibi district is number 28 found in the western most part of Pakistan, but if you click on the link to the page on Sibi it should Sibi is where 27 is more in the center of the Pakistan near Quetta. There are others that seem to have the same off by 1 error (e.g. Killa Abdullah). I am not knowledgeable enough to fix this but would be grateful if some fixed it our pointed me to an accurate map of the districts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gory (talk • contribs) 23:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)