Talk:DisruptJ20/Archive 1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Saturnalia0 in topic Additional source available
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Well done (and a couple suggestions)
…to article creators, for a thoroughly sourced and well-presented initial article. Some suggestions for continuing with it:
- expect of contributors (through editorial consensus) that further additions follow your pattern—no new content without reputable sourcing;
- correct the lede if necessary, even condense a bit, but do not let it fail to summarise the article, as WP policies and guidelines set out;
- take great care, but to not shrink from stating the names of individuals involved, based on reputable news reports, especially ones that can be connected with organization's press releasees (i.e., where organizational claims are vetted by news organizations, leading to a story in "print" combining claimed and verified responsibility (and where this relates to what draw me to the article, attempting to discern whether the name regularly appearing DisruptJ20 participant's name, "Legbo Carrefour" was, as it appears, a voodoo-referencing nom de guerre, rather than a real name); and
- keep the article updated, so that it becomes clear whether the organization continues after its initial activities.
Cheers, and thanks again for a good start toward an eventual "good article." 73.210.155.96 (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Also, as article expands, the current mentions of O'Keefe and Veritas might better fit in terms of extent of description. But for now, that aspect of the article is now overemphasized. More critical to the development of the article are clear elaboration of who they are (including leadership), any available published description/analysis giving a demarcation regarding the inauguration events with which they were and were not associated, and then reporting on any subsequent, post-January 20 activities. Thanks again, cheers. 73.210.155.96 (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Discussion regarding Anti-fascism in the US category
I made this category invisible as a middle ground, adding an in-yet note, until discussion about it resolved, see discussion at User Talk:FallingGravity page. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Additional source available
This Washington Post story was recently added to the O'Keefe article and could help with the [who?] and [clarification needed] issues tagged in the last paragraph of the History and protest planning section. Saturnalia0 (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)