Talk:Discovery Zone

Deleted Speculation

I deleted a sentance that speculated that it "probobly" went into bankrupcy because of lawsuits. Wikipedia isn't a place for speculation, if DZ had a history of lawsuits that a lot of people speculate might of led to it's downfall than that would be a great addition to this article, however to simply say that thier bankrupcy was "probobly" caused by lawsuits of kids getting hurt is not. Deathawk 05:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Found an article with real information that's probably of use for this and other CEC articles: [1] --24.23.84.46 05:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

At least spell sentence and bankruptcy correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.78.84 (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

IPO/Debt is not right

It says their IPO led to them "raising over $50 trillion in one month" thats impossible, also in bankruptcy it says "with debts of up to $3." I doubt with 50 trillion in the bank they couldn't pay that $3 bill...I don't know how to edit this, if someone else could remove those numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.193.108.164 (talk) 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

New business of the same name may not be the old business

I see that in recent months this article has been reworked around a single new location operating under that name. Do we have any reliable source claiming that this is the same business? Otherwise, including that at all beyond a passing mention seems inappropriate. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC) And here is coverage noting that it is unclear that this is a revival of the business. I just did a restoration of the lead, but I recommend that we revert the entire article to its January 24th state, with an addition of a single sentence noting the new effort. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

I have now flagged the section on the new business as off-topic, as this very much looks to be a legally-unrelated business of the same name. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)