Talk:Discovery Channel (Australia and New Zealand)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Usernamekiran in topic Requested move 19 September 2022

Fair use rationale for Image:Discovery-logo.jpg

edit
 

Image:Discovery-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Discoverytravel 158x200.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 January 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: the first five articles are not moved at this time, per the discussion below. In the final three cases, there is no consensus to move the pages to the proposed titles in this discussion. I would suggest waiting a bit and then initiating a new discussion to reconsider whether or not to add "channel" in some form to those titles. Dekimasuよ! 21:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


– Another proposal to move some cable TV channel articles to the correct "by country" disambiguation, as per WP:NCBC (and WP:NCTV).
  Note: I've proposed shortening the name of Discovery Channel (Middle East and North Africa) to Discovery Channel (Middle Eastern TV channel), as per WP:CONCISE – however, I also intend to create Discovery Channel (North African TV channel) and Discovery Channel (Middle Eastern and North African TV channel) as redirects if this proposal passes. --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 19:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wrong wording

edit

I think that the content in Shark Week Line 2 seems a bit biased to a certain point of view, but I am don't know what we shall do about this since the author would've created it with best of intentions. But it is something that it is hard for everybody else to believe. --Qwerty123M (talk) 03:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 September 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Discovery Channel (Australia and New Zealand) per the discussion below. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Discovery (Australia and New Zealand)Discovery Channel (Australian and New Zealand TV channel) – The title should be inline with other article per WP:NCTV and WP:NCBC John123521 (Talk-Contib.) 12:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Relisting comment: Relisting to give folks an opportunity to respond to Amakuru's comment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.