Talk:Diplodocidae

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Let's name names. :-) edit

"A diplodocid was recently found with a row of keratinous (horny, not bony) spines running down its back." -- Which diplodocid (or find), please? -- Writtenonsand 12:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Diplodocus sp. Can't seem to find the ref though. And I'd remove 'recently', it was found in 1992. Dinoguy2 21:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
...actually I wonderd about this at the time as there wasn't a whole lot written on the subject. I agree it is worth following up as it is an interesting facet of what they may look like...cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 22:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Remove the "Baby Toni" picture edit

A recent study showed that Toni was actually a Brachiosaurus. (Carballido, J.L.; Marpmann, J.S.; Schwarz-Wings, D.; and Pabst, B. (2012). "New information on a juvenile sauropod specimen from the Morrison Formation and the reassessment of its systematic position". Palaeontology 55 (2): 567–582.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.159.230.184 (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Brachiosaurus or brachiosaur? FunkMonk (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A WP:OR? edit

  • This article contains the unreferenced text "(though in life the nostrils themselves would have been close to the tip of the snout)". Who decided that? It seems likelier to me that in such a huge animal having to breathe through such a small head, the nostrils would have to be so big that they could only fit in on top of the head. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's based on this study:[1] It has gone unchallenged since. FunkMonk (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diplodocid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply