This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Digital wallet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Universal card edit
Universal card is a new article accepted by WP:AFC. Reviewers recognised the potential to merge this content into Digital wallet or Magnetic stripe card. I believe this is a determination that can be made by the editors of these articles. ~KvnG 19:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement edit
This article talks about the advantages of digital wallets without ever mentioning the problems with them. It has no information about acceptance rates. It reads like an ad for the digital wallet industry. In addition, it's quite vague about what the security issues might be, what the range of actions might be that different kinds require of the customer, etc. Basically it's a rather poor summary, at least at the time I read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.11.209 (talk) 23:47, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Only devices? edit
The article defines a digital wallet (including the redirect E-Wallet) as an "electronic device". This excludes purely software-based wallets, which seem like the standard case to me. Any objections that I broaden the definition in this regard? --KnightMove (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Pronunciation edit
It is not explained how to pronounce "wallet mobiles". - --KitchM (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)