Talk:Digital hearing aid

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Fuhghettaboutit in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


Digital Hearing AidDigital hearing aid

I can only presume that this is not a patented title; but rather is a generic thing or category, just like "analogy hearing aid", which appears in the main text. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, I think the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upcased just because it is abbreviated with caps.

I haven't done a technical move request because there's a slight chance I might be wrong on the patented, commercial-name issue. Thanks. Tony (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think it should just be merged with Hearing aid which is being discussed on its talk page. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Very good idea. Do you know how to prompt this? There's a template somewhere. Tony (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
There is already a link to the discussion on the article("It has been suggested that this article be merged into Hearing aid.") if that's what you mean. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Tsk, silly me. Tony (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry; I do that all the time. :) 331dot (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.