Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Abryn in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • The gameplay image does not appear to have an actual source.
    • Fixed.
  • I can't really see if the source is accurate as I cannot read Japanese, but does it confirm that Bullets is known for their work on Hero Bank?
    • Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
      • My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
        • They helped work on it, but saying they're "known" for it is a real stretch. Changed the sentences. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I would recommend taking text that is a large quotation, such as with Nintendo World Report, and rewriting it to be a summation of what they said instead. In general I encourage that you get the sentiment across of what they said, like instead of quoting IGN saying ugly you might try something else.
  • Sources that it combines mechanics from Dig Dugs 1 and 2 should be used in the Gameplay section as well.
    • Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply