Talk:Die Weltwoche

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 91.20.9.237 in topic 2019-06 unreliable source?

Re INFORMATION EXCHANGE.
To Whoever made this article.
Dear Sir or Lady!
You state that the WELTWOCHE "started off somewhat sympathetic to the Nazi Government of Germany". This is correct. But unfortunately your colleagues at the German Wikipedia (we Swiss have not an own WP) do not have this knowledge. Also unfortunately, nobody at the German WP will ever listen to someone that has not been given Authority. But to YOU they might listen. In return THEY might tell YOU, that your idea that "the other Swiss Media" were "vigorously opposing" the Nazis is Nonsense with Sauce. And there THEY would be correct. And so this would be a fruitbearing information exchange.
Merry Christmas! --BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 09:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

It seems that this has already been integrated into the German page. I know this was three years ago. However, a Swiss German edition of Wikipedia *did* exist three years ago! It is simply called the Alemannisch version.[[1]]--Ami in CH (talk) 07:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Positions Today

edit

I did not translate a few sentences concerning the fight over "freedom of speech" surrounding the "Rassismus-Strafnorm." I am personally uncertain as to how I should translate the title of the law itself – something along the lines of "Racism Penal Code." I find that translation to be wholly inadequate, therefore the quotations marks. It would also go against the position maintained on the Foreign Relations of Switzerland page, which states that "Switzerland has no international disputes."

Either way, for those interested, it is illegal to deny the "Armenian Genocide" in Switzerland, among other things. A Turkish politician did just that, and was, in turn, charged with violating the law.[[2]] Christoph Blocher then travelled to Turkey and, in violation of normal standards of "collegiality" within the Federal Council of Switzerland, stated that he wanted to repeal said law.[[3]]

The Weltwoche supported Blocher's position and his statements in Turkey, both of which were controversial in Switzerland, hence the mention on the German page. As this is not discussed anywhere concerning Switzerland, as far as I am aware, on the English version of Wikipedia, I have left it out. It is, though, discussed on Dogu Perincek's page.

I am posting this to preempt any criticism surrounding my failure to translate this section.--Ami in CH (talk) 07:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Center-Left Swiss Media?

edit

I am not entirely certain if I can agree with this statement: "Already distinguishing itself somewhat from the generally center-left Swiss media by its general orientation, the magazine is now especially noted for its interviews with controversial public figures and for the diversity of opinion represented in its pages, with a dominant right-wing view however."

First of all, the English is inadequate, which means that it should, at the very least, be rephrased.

Second, "by its general orientation" appears to imply "bias" along the lines of the "liberal bias" theory in the US. Zürich's leading newspaper, die Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), for example, is vehemently center-right and fairly close to the FDP in Zürich. The NZZ is also the "international" newspaper of German-speaking Switzerland. You'll find it places like Frankfurt and London (I know I have). It might be slightly behind the Tages Anzeiger in circulation, but one does need to take into consideration which type of person reads which paper (I am an NZZ subscriber).

Third, you might also consider exactly "where" the SVP ranks when it comes to political parties. Wikipedia itself seems to rank this Swiss movement as the "right-wing populist" party par excellence alongside the British National Party and Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front. It even says that "contemporary" right-wing populism started in Switzerland -- and that it is the only country where it is still gaining ground -- never mind the fact that the SVP is now the largest party. After all, the SVP and Switzerland seem to dominate the right-wing populism page's contemporary section. Where then, should our center of gravity lie? --Ami in CH (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Die Weltwoche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Die Weltwoche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

2019-06 unreliable source?

edit

See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#2019-06 Die Weltwoche. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Weltwoche is also cited by de:Tichys Einblick [4] --91.20.9.237 (talk) 13:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply