Talk:Didymo in New Zealand

Adverse effects

What are the adverse effects of Didymo? Article doesn't say. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Strange statement

"an extensive public awareness campaign to encourage river users to clean their equipment after use in affected waterways. This campaign was highly successful, with up to a 90% decrease in use of affected rivers."

What is this supposed to mean. How is a 90% reduction in use of affected rivers a successful outcome for a campaign ? If 90% of fishers and boaters have now been discouraged from pursuing activities which they presumably previously enjoyed, then the loss of that enjoyment is a public dis-benefit and can hardly be characterised as highly successful.Eregli bob (talk) 13:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

It also lacks a reliable source. I have tagged it as 'needing a citation'. Alternatively you could be bold and delete it. Mrfebruary (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Didymo in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619131502/http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz:80/media/10-02-10/didymo-confirmed-in-waimakariri-river to http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/media/10-02-10/didymo-confirmed-in-waimakariri-river

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)