Talk:Didn't We (Richard Harris song)/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cartoon network freak in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Lead
edit- as the record's single → which single was it?
- it charted in lower positions → it charted at lower positions
- In that same year → That same year
- It peaked at number 82 → Her version peaked at number 82 (for clarification)
- Other versions exist, recorded by Matt Monro and Frank Sinatra → Other artists like Matt Monro and Frank Sinatra also recorded their rendition of "Didn't We"
Infobox
edit- flawless ;)
Background and composition
edit- In the same year → That same year
- standalone 7" record as the second single → standalone 7" record, serving as the second single
Reception
edit- acclaimed the production used in "Didn't We" → acclaimed the production of "Didn't We"
- peak position of number 63 → "of" to "at"
Cover versions and appearances
edit- Rename section into "Cover versions and other usage"
- placed it on 25th studio album, → placed it on his 25th studio album
- also for AllMusic → "for" to "from"
- rereleased → re-released
Track listings and formats
edit- flawless ;)
Charts
edit- flawless ;)
Barbara Streisand version
editInfobox
edit- Unlink 7" here
Background and reception
edit- writer of The Barbra Streisand Companion felt as if it → comma after "Companion"
Chart performance
edit- flawless ;)
Promotion
edit- Change title of subtopic in "Promotion and other usage"
- Release year in brackets for "Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered"
- an earlier version "Didn't We" on her → an earlier version of "Didn't We" on her
Track listings
edit- flawless ;)
Charts
edit- flawless ;)
Other stuff
editCopy-violation
edit- 10,7% is accpetable!
Images
edit- Article is perfectly illustrated by images ;)
Links
editReferences
edit- As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
- No dead links! Well done!
Outcome
edit- On hold for 7 days! Well done, Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Cartoon network freak: All done. Thank you as always. Carbrera (talk) 03:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC).
- Gladly passing! Congrats, Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.