Talk:Diaphragm (mechanical device)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I WANT THE DETAILS ABOUT EGR VALVE (EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION)
USING DIAPHRAGM AND ITS MANUFACTURING PROCESS ALSO ITS MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Rename page?
editI'm trying to find consensus for renaming "(mechanics)" pages, where "mechanics" refers to machinery, mechanisms, mechanical devices or mechanical engineering, rather than (e.g. classical) mechanics in physics and applied math. I would like to rename this page to "Diaphragm (mechanism)" or "Diaphragm (mechanical device)". Any preferences or objections? Geometry guy 20:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I think that's a good idea there are some very technical definitions on Wikipedia. It would make sense to use more accurate, technically correct labels. I personally prefer Mechanical Device but I don't think there is a huge difference, so long as it differentiates devices from the mathematical subject, like you say. --lucuzade (talk) 11:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're replying to something from over 2 years ago, and the article has already been renamed. --Athol Mullen (talk) 11:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
References
editI tried finding some references, but all I could find was to do with contraception. This is a little outside my knowledge (physics, not so much contraception) but there must be some textbooks or journals about this. DRosin (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)