Talk:Diana Marshall/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I think I can safely pass this. There are no real issues with the prose, the images are fair use with a proper rationale and CC-BY-SA respectively and everything is sourced to a reliable third party publications.

I have but two suggestions for further improvement—the storylines section is quite big and could probably do with a subheader or two to break it up and your linking should be consistent: in the references, Hachette Filipacchi (UK) Ltd is linked at every occurrence, but Digital Spy is only linked the once. Either link everything every time or everything just the once.

You know where I am if you have any questions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for the review and for the pass! I could probably trim the storylines some more and the linking thing wasn't me - [1] - JuneGloom Talk 13:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)