Talk:Diamond Light Source

I have some recolation that the French Government (or one of their agencies) was also involved in funding Diamond - and that they supported the Welcome Trust in siting it at RAL rather than Darsbury. Is this correct? If so could we add something about it? Andreww 08:02, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Formally the final location of Dimaond was chosen due to the synergy with other facilities (ISIS, CLF, Culham etc). There are many rumours on this topic (e.g. The French wanted X, W.T. wanted Y), and if any are true then there is no evidence of this (in the public domain). In other words the French involvement in the final location is nothing more than rumour...and this sis something strenouously denied by those involved at the time.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.26 (talk) 09:37, 15 August 2007

Not a volt!!

3GeV is not three thousand million volts Lipatden 14:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

well it is really as its an electron accelerator and 1eV is the energy required to accelerate an electron through a potential of 1 volt

What was bigger 30 years ago?

I often heard that Diamond is the biggest UK experiment for 30 years. What was it that was built 30 years ago?

SteveTraylen 09:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

In fact Diamond is the largest project for almost 40 years, since the then Nimrod project at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Nimrod being the forerunner of the ISIS neutron Spalation Facility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.26 (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2006

Synchrotron building

Diamond is housed in a silver toroidal building which covers approximately the area of 5 football pitches.

Marked for clarification because

• the area of a football pitch can vary by a factor of almost 3, and is also unfamiliar to those (like me) who have never attended a football match (or to American readers, a soccer match). I think the area should be given in standard units like hectares, acres or square kilometres.
• the next sentence says the building houses the storage ring and the beamlines, but there's no mention of the linear accelerator or the booster synchrotron. Where are they housed?

Musiconeologist (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:DiamondSynchrotron.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:DiamondSynchrotron.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

why is this article advertising for The Costain Ltd.

″Costain Ltd constructed the building and the synchrotron hall. Significant construction achievements to note:

i) The project was completed on time and on budget;

ii) The construction of Diamond was completed with one of the lowest accident rates of a mega project completed in the UK. Over 1.3 million manhours were completed during the peak of construction without a single accident."

This adds very little to the information on Diamond itself and sounds like it was written by someone doing PR work for Costain Ltd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.63.51 (talk) 23:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. Edited accordingly. Feline Hymnic (talk) 23:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Diamond Light Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130707191907/http://www.diamond.ac.uk/Home/About/Company.html to http://www.diamond.ac.uk/Home/About/Company.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19981205225006/http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/ to http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.research-sites.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Formatting of references

At present the website citations are all in different formats. Also I don't think the Notes and References sections need to be separate. Musiconeologist (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

I've converted the one note to an ordinary reference, and removed the Notes section. (Really that note should be body text anyway, with its own citation.) Musiconeologist (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)