Talk:Diadematidae

Animals Low‑importance

Diadematidae is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life To do:

Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up.

Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject:

Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment
Other: See the projects page
Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons
Featured Articles/Good Articles:
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

HI - a basic table listing biological taxonomy isn't real useful - could you try to make it more of an article and not jsut a data sheet? I've noticed this comment getting made on some of the other pages you have created as well. Regards Manning 02:14, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Hello Manning

Thank you for your suggestion. Of course that I don't agree with your stattement that a table listing biological taxa is no useful. You can pick informations among several books and all of them have taxonomical lists about the described species.Is a very usefull way to understand the taxonomical position of each species. Realy worst is the fact that one can't have a complete taxa description about a specific group withouth having to read several authors and compare them, for finaly conclude in which direction to go. All I'm presenting is a simple way to have species taxonomy in a simple and comprehensive way. This is complete diferent from Wikipedia Tree of Life and of course can be linked to that project, assuming that you can find in W. Tree of Life no more than a few species.As for the description I assume that W. Tree of Life is the correct place for explain each species. You can also see another list of taxonomical clasifications in Shark taxonomy specialy in Shark taxonomy Order Hexanchiformes and so far I didn't received any indication of no useful lists.If you saw some of that information, please let me know because as I've not seen I would like to answer.Tank you--JPPINTO 00:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Add topic