Talk:Devizes Plot
Latest comment: 6 hours ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Devizes Plot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
More Sources edit
If anyone has access to the following:
- The London Cage (by Scotland), though note what's already said in the literature section by Normann
- The London Cage (by Helen Fry)
- Newspapers covering the plot at the time, in particular there was apparently significant coverage of the trial of Rosterg's murderers according to De Normann ( [1] etc)
Please let me know or expand the article with them. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also "The March on London" by Charles Whiting (this one is on openlib), Hitler's hangmen by Gerwarth might have something. Pahunkat (talk) 08:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process edit
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that if the Devizes Plot had been successful, 7,000 German prisoners of war would have escaped and attacked RAF Yatesbury? Source: https://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/headlines/nostalgia/2386661.grisly-tale-of-revenge/ , Whiting, The March on London, p. 72, 177
- ALT1: ... that the failure of the Devizes Plot led to the lynching of a German prisoner of war, who was incorrectly accused of being an informant? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/dec/23/secondworldwar.comment
- ALT2: ... that two Americans were awarded the Bronze Star Medal for uncovering the Devizes Plot? Source: De Normann, For Führer and Fatherland, p.98
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This article was a pain to write thanks to sources managing to contradict each other in various ways. These three hooks seem relatively uncontested. All book sources are available on the open library for verification.
Moved to mainspace by Pahunkat (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Pahunkat (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC).
Approved ALT0–2: Article is new enough, long enough, well-cited to reliable sources, presentable, and with no policy issues detected (neutrality, BLP, copyvio). Non-boldlinked articles in hooks also look presentable, with no maintenance banners. Hooks are formatted and of good length, with hook facts cited in article. Verified hook fact for ALT0, ALT1. AGF for ALT2 (pages 88–101 of De Normann not available at open library). QPQ waived. I feel that ALT0 is the most interesting of the three. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
