Talk:Development life cycle

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Deckiller in topic Copy-edit complete

Comments edit

Someone added back the text I changed, which is not helpful to the article. Therefore I would revert back. Snowynight 23:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copy-editing questions, comments edit

  • Many references needed. These passages removed from "Step One," needing references, also some clarification:
    • As a result, many IT consultant job is very well paid and in a high demand in IT industry.
    • Again, if time allows consultants need to spend 40% of their time interviewing stakeholders. Knowing clients' or users' requirements will help eliminate problems to arise in the future.

beverson 00:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


  • Again, more references would be helpful in "Step Two." Also, a passage removed from section is copied below for review, discussion (I think this is just redundant, but I admit this article is not within my expertise):
    • This part of the process demands high-level problem-solving skills. As a result, analysis becomes more important as user’s requirement became more considered.

beverson 15:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


  • "Step Three" is complete with no major deletions. However, the lack of references is still quite notable. Also, the scope of this article is, in my mind, extremely broad — it could definitely be improved by a tighter focus, more examples, and a more clear purpose.

beverson 15:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


  • "Step Four" is complete with no major deletions. However, this section is very thin. Could use much more information in the way of how long the testing process lasts, what steps take place, etc., etc.

beverson 16:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


  • "Step Five" is complete. Again, very thin.

16:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Copy-edit complete edit

  • The copy edit of this page is complete and now needs to be proofread. The article is still in need of a great deal of help, however. It definitely needs references and more information. —beverson 16:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
    • Agreed. This page should also be merged as a subsection into a larger article, methinks. — Deckiller 16:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply