 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Comment edit
I have deleted one of the key people because her inclusion was an error. She was an EVP and only CEOs are listed.
Denniswarlick (talk) 13:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)denniswarlick
- EVP is a notable position. Plus -- given your clear conflict of interest, I'm very uncomfortable with your questionable edits. Epeefleche (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Denniswarlick (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)denniswarlick As an agency has dozens of EVPs, it was not appropriate to include them all, nor to include just one. Therefore I deleted the one listed. In comparing to other wiki pages, I see that this is the right thing to do.
- That's not the case with this agency. And you -- as an editor with a clear conflict of interest -- are poorly positioned to edit in this fashion, and exercise your conflict-of-interest judgment here. This is precisely the sort of thing -- editorial judgment -- where conflict-of-interest editors are not supposed to exercise their paid-by-the-subject-of-the-article judgment. --Epeefleche (talk) 20:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Notability edit
User:Number 57 (who deleted the original article) has more details on notability. Jokestress (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Twitter edit
The twitter feed was deleted ... can anyone see it on the company url? If not, a twitter feed, if authenticated, is appropriate. The FB page is linked on the company url, and is therefore not appropriate. --Epeefleche (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
COI problem edit
This article was mentioned on WP:COIN as being too promotional, so I did some cleanup and improved the article. More useful info, less lists. John Nagle (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Tx. --Epeefleche (talk) 05:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Mitsubishi commercials edit
I have several credible sources — including a lengthy Washington Post piece — about two ad campaigns Deutsch created for Mitsubishi in the late ‘90s and early 2000s. Several of the ads in that campaign received attention from numerous media outlets, particularly their “Days Go By” ad. Would it be appropriate to add a paragraph summarizing the campaign and including relevant statistics tied to resulting increased brand recognition? Or would that be too close to promotion-style material? Thank you, - Historical-idealist (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Mr delicious edit
They did the campaign that killed Rax too Carbonara4 (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)