Talk:Destruction of art in Afghanistan
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edits, Cites and Fine Tuning still coming..
editHello all- hopefully you enjoy what I have compiled thus far, obviously there is plenty of room to expound -- There is still quite a bit of formatting and citing that I don't expressly understand and needs work but I will continue to work on this in the coming weeks. Links and pictures are on the way. MercedesSS (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 15 November 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved uncontroversially (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Destruction of Art in Afghanistan → Destruction of art in Afghanistan – "art" is not a proper noun; it's a common noun. George Ho (talk) 03:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy I'd be bold and just go for it. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
editThis article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by WikiProject Art and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)