Talk:Destroyermen

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pscsuk in topic Error in Iron Gray Sea description

Click on a link labeled "Main Article" and end up right back here, usually with little to no information on the topic of the section that's supposed to be a main article? Well that's lovely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.118.110 (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Destroyer class??

edit

The destroyers in this series are described as old "four-stackers." Wikipedia shows several sub-classes of four-stack destroyers built for WW I (though none of these ships made into WW II, as in this series. Did the author select one of the actual classes, combine characteristics of several, or make up his own?Jim Stinson (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Based on the research I've been able to do, USS Walker (DD-163) and USS Mahan (DD-102) were both Wickes-class destroyers (a class which did indeed have four funnels or "stacks"); the only liberty the author seems to have taken is including both of them in the Second Battle of the Java Sea (Walker was slated for conversion to a damage-control hulk in 1939 and subsequently scuttled in 1941; Mahan, meanwhile, was scrapped in 1931. Both of these events took place well before the aforementioned battle). --Special Operative MACAVITYDebrief me 13:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Destroyermen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Genre

edit

The Destroyermen series has been classed as "alternate history" by most reviewers, see, for example, "North Texas author Taylor Anderson’s ‘Destroyermen’ series continues" and "Devil's Due (Destroyermen, book 12) by Taylor Anderson". Recently (July and August 2018) IP user 204.111.103.12 (204.111.103.10) has added "sword & sorcery" to the genre list. Both Timmccloud and I have removed these additions, as being inappropriate classification; as Timmccloud put it in an edit summary: Reverted good faith edits by 204.111.103.12 (talk): Not a valid genre for this series. No spells, mostly firearms not swords. Alternate History suffices. See also "An Interview With Taylor Anderson". --Bejnar (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Error in Iron Gray Sea description

edit

I'm not editing it myself, because I haven't read far enough to be certain, but in the Iron Gray Sea section, it says " It was later revealed in Deadly Seas that Amerika was converted..." - Should that be "Deadly Shore" rather than "Deadly Seas". There isn't a book called "Deadly Seas" (but it may mean something else I haven't come across yet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pscsuk (talkcontribs) 13:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply