Talk:Destination X (2008)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will begin this review shortly.

MathewTownsend (talk) 21:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Review

This is a very complicated article with a great deal of information. Everything checks out for what I can tell. Nicely formatted! I made a few copy edits[1] which you are free to change.

There were a few places where I had questions about the prose:

  • Lede
  • This event marked the second time the Elevation X match was used by TNA. - what does "used by TNA" mean?
    • TNA created the match and this was the second time it was used. A scaffold match is somewhat rare in wrestling but has been done several times. They gave it the Elevation X name.--WillC 00:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Storylines
  • Aftermath

I will put the review on hold.

MathewTownsend (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    The lead is very much a summary.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    All is in order.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Well referenced and accurately reflects the sources
    C. No original research:  
    There is no OR
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Covers all aspects
    B. Focused:  
    Remains focused on the article subject
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neutrally worded
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Very stable
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Public domain images; one fair-use that has the proper rationale
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Nicely illustrated with informative captions properly formatted.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC) Thank you for the review and passing the article.--WillC 02:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply