This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
While the taxonomic box and the main text agree that there are six genera, they don't agree as to what the genera are! The taxo box says 'Vanderhoofius', whereas the main article has 'Kronokotherium'; are these synonyms or truly considered as separate genera?Glevum (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
I forgot that I redirected Vanderhoofius to Desmostylus. I amended the taxobox accordingly.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
