Talk:Design knowledge
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Designergene in topic Breadth and reliability
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
It has been improved; it will be improved further. Please do not delete.
Civil Engineering as design knowledge edit
How come this article doesn't talk about civil engineering design knowledge?... Engineering should be part of the design discipline materials ...as well as discussions on discipline specific design knowledge... Thanks
Risk Engineer (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Breadth and reliability edit
The article lacks the breadth due for the topic of Design Knowledge. Its reliability seems questionable: it was created by contributor X F Zha in 2009 with several citations to that person's work, and few other contributors since. Designergene (talk) 17:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 | This article references a source that one of the article's contributors wrote or published. Citing oneself is allowed on Wikipedia, but may represent a conflict of interest. Contributors should be careful not to place undue weight on their own work, and are discouraged from excessive self-citation. Guidelines relevant to this situation include Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:SELFPUBLISHED. |