Talk:Desert Strike/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Kung Fu Man in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- See note
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Passing GAN. There's one minor thing though...in the reception section, you repeat several times "The magazine" at the start of a sentence. It's not a major thing that'd break the article for me, but it does honestly come across a little repetitive, and tweaking every other sentence with this like possibly combining it into the previous one were doable would help make the prose smoother.
I have no qualms beyond that, this was informative and a pleasure to read.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)