This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
One unsourced edit: "Dent is often reported to be the first evidence of Man and mammoth found together or alternatively to be the first Clovis site excavated. It is neither. The first report of professional work at the Blackwater Draw Clovis site is in the November 25, 1932 issue of Science News.[citation needed] The publications on Burnet Cave and Blackwater Draw directly contradict statements by several authors (for example see Haynes 2002:56 The Early Settlement of North America) that Dent, Colorado was the first excavated Clovis site. The Dent Site, in Weld County, Colorado, was simply a fossil mammoth excavation in 1932. The first Dent Clovis point was found November 5, 1932 and the in situ point was found July 7, 1933. The in situ Clovis point from Burnet Cave was excavated in late August, 1931 (and reported early in 1932). E. B. Howard brought the Burnet Cave point to the 3rd Pecos Conference, September 1931, and showed it around to several archaeologists interested in Early Man (see Woodbury 1983)[citation needed]."
Incomplete situation (<ref>Waters and Stafford 2007 Science.</ref>) swapped out for a complete, valid citation.
Removal of "is the first culture in the Americas to use projectile points in hunting. Previous to that, indigenous people used a tool-kit like that used in Asia, which included large axe cutting tools, scrapers, blades and flake tools." Is there another culture that I'm unaware of on the North American continent that used projectile points BEFORE the Clovis point?--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Comments about edits:
I think that the problem here is wording. Yes, when I did the research I saw the info about Blackwater Draw. I think the point here is that Dent is the "earliest" evidence of man with mammoth. "First" was probably not the best word to use.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand swapping out an incomplete citation for a complete one. If you prefer to use a later source (good idea), can we get the complete info for it before we swap it out.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Don't understand the removal of Clovis being the first culture to use projectile points in the Americas. Was there an earlier culture that used projectile points in the Americas?--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am very happy to help sort out the edits, but they seem to be more a sign of vandalism than anything else. If I'm wrong, again, I'd love to sort it out.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
