Talk:Denise Chong

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeDenise Chong was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 8, 2009Articles for deletionKept
April 5, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Denise Chong/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Consider putting a photo as GA criteria suggests photo. Spevw (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Started review. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Clearly written, in good prose with correct spelling and grammar

edit

Grammar and spelling OK, writing style acceptable. Article needs an infobox such as Template:Infobox Person or appropriate variant. The lead is very spare at only one sentence, needs expansion to summarise article. Early life and schooling need some expansion, eg which high school?, information about family, religion, etc. Background, what were formative influences? The Publications (or better Published Works) section should be laid out in the customary style for articles about writers as that appears to be her primary attribute. The Publications section should be towards the bottom, the Ongoing Contributions section contaions material that should be in Biographical section. Please read and understand WP:MOS. Lokk at other good artciles to get an idea. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

a (prose):   b (MoS):  

Factually accurate according to information in reliable sources

edit

Article relies heavily on tertiary sources, mainly the The Canadian Encyclopedia. Much of the content is either directly copied or slightly paraphrased. This is not acceptable and leads to immediate failure of Good Article Review. Please read and understand {{WP:RS]]. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  

Broad in coverage of the topic without unnecessary digressions

edit

Not broad, career as economist needs further expansion as does early life. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

a (major aspects):   b (focused):  

Written from a neutral point of view

edit

The article appears to be written from a neural point of view. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair representation without bias:  

Stable, with no ongoing edit wars

edit

No evidence of edit warring, no discussion on talk page. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


No edit wars etc.:  

Compliant with image use policy

edit

No images used so does not apply. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall

edit

This article needs considerable work to bring it up to GA standard. I will re-rate it as Start but fail GAR. Please renominate when it has been improved. Should probably be re-nominated under the Literature category. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pass/Fail:  

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Denise Chong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denise Chong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply