Talk:Deniliquin railway line

Border crossing (moved from user talk)

For Echuca railway line, Victoria, how do you mean "the border crossing icon looks a mess compared to the main bridge one"?
As far as I can tell the image is much clearer than the image , because in the latter I can't see what is border and what is river. --121.200.0.46 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I just don't like the weird round thingy in the middle. Anyway, I believe the border crossing icon (as well as the rest of them) comes from the German Wikipedia and were intended for international border crossings. In this case it is a state border, with no border control, and the track is owned by the same people on either side under the 1922 Border Railways Act. In the end, it seems the issue is about what everyone thinks looks better! Wongm (talk) 03:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I know, but I just have trouble distinguishing between the river and the border. I personally don't have a problem with the 'round thingy', I just think the round thingy is clearer. --121.200.0.46 (talk) 03:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

is indeed the sign for international borders! Axpde (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ballarat to Daylesford railway line, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 07:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deniliquin railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829163240/http://www.vline.com.au/maps/maps/north.html to http://www.vline.com.au/maps/maps/north.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Name issue

Revert to the original correct name "Deniliquin railway line". There is no reference to this line being know as "Murray Valley railway line", it has never been known as this name in it's history, also, a Google search returns no results for the changed name. This other name also will cause confusion with the Murray Basin Rail Project. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Is this the railway mentioned in In Search of the Castaways?

Jules Verne writes in In Search of the Castaways (Les Enfants du capitaine Grant) of a railway in Victoria. It goes from Melbourne to Sandhurst (which is the present Bendigo, I guess), via Kyneton and Castlemaine. An accident on this line is important for the novel. Is this that railway? If so, it could well be mentioned in the article. Fomalhaut76 (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)