This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
I am sorry, but the changes made in the summer of 2019 are completely wrong. You cannot just take the name of a clearly defined family (Denropithecidae) a apply it to a new clade which contains a part of that family and a huge subfamily of another (hitherto) family. You have to publish this usage first, only then you can use it at all, not to mention in an encyclopaedia. In other words: Dendropithecidae is still only Dendropithecus, Simiolus and possibly Micropithecus (i.e. from the perspective of the 2019 a paraphyletic taxon, but there are also other studies with different results) and the clade described in the current version of this article is an unnamed clade, but definitely not "Dendropithecidae". Primatologist402 (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
