Talk:Demographics of Sri Lanka/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Reference

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has no reference whatsoever «₪Mÿš†íc₪» ^(T) 20:45, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Reference are given now. I think you should correct your edits on "colombo" and "sri lanka" demographics as they are compleately inaccorate.Lets make Wikipedia aQuality source for infomation.;) (Unsigned comment).

Demography

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The percentages of the populations add up to more than 100%.

Sinhalese: 73% Sri Lankan Tamil: 18% Indian Tamil: 5% Moors and Malays: 7% This adds up to 103% and does not include the other minorities. I know that three is a problem with the sensus in Sri Lanka, but there has to be some way to clarify this. Academic Challenger 00:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

In the religion sub-section, it states Buddhism 73.7%, Hinduism 10.9%, Islam 7.6%,Christianity 6.2% Hindus have been underquoted. Sinhalese are 73.8%, but not all Sinhalese are Buddhist. I read elsewhere, Buddhism 70%, Hinduism 15%, which seems more realistic. Atif.hussain (talk) 00:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't add up, because somebody is busy manipulating facts and numbers. He/she is saying he/she is stating the CIA fact book, which is not true. Look at this: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ce.html

Sri Lankan Tamils are not 18% at present. At independence in 1948 Sri Lankan Tamils were about 8%. Half of the Tamil population has emigrated and therefore SL tamils in sri lanka can't be 18%. (I am of Tamil origin - if anybody thinks that is relevant). --SriSuren (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I have clarified your addition to the article. The CIA Fact Book is very misleading because it relies on the 2001 census which was only carried put partially in the north and east. The Sri Lankan government estimates that the Tamils (both Sri Lankan and Indian) are about 18%.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 18:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Same links which says unpecified or unclassified as 10% which means 10 person Tamils are not calculated because of Sri Lankan War.--Jai Kumara Yesappa (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

"Smaller minorities"

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there any data we could scrounge up on the minorities no one talks about? Even here, the Malays and the Burghers seem to be the only other minorities mentioned. I'm talking here about groups such as the Parsis, the Chetties, the Kaffirs, Sri Lankan Chinese, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.47.11 (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Arrive

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Who arrived first? sinhales or tamils? Sinhales arrived from Bengalia or Maharashtra?--Kaiyr (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Demographics of Sri Lanka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Sri Lanka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)