Talk:Demographics of North Korea/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Literacy
Are these figures considered accurate among academics and serious researchers? --Dpr 04:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
This caught my eye as well. It would seem like the UNDP has a policy of nation self reporting statistics to them? I'm going to do some research and see if I can find any support for the durrent numbers. -LouieS 17:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It takes a speaker of Korean 2-4 hours to learn the alphabet. It takes a foreigner perhaps a day. Illiteracy is not an issue.
IIRC, my university's KS professor (not a Korean) mentioned a tradition of very high literacy in both Koreas without expressing such doubts. I think he gave a percentage of 90% or more. 00:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Check the CIA factbook - the data is very similar.
- Literacy has been, since the start of North Korea, a massive priority in order to empower, mobilize, and propagandaize to the poor. The government made enourmous strides to wipe out illiteracy. The figures match that of the south and other nations according to the CIA factbook which does not simply use government figures. The notion that North Korea is a nation with a literacy issue is without merit and sadly a wrong impression that stems from anti north korean sentiment in the US. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icactus (talk • contribs) 16:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
big block of text
this has loads of text before the introduction and not many pictures. i also has lots of text before the nav-bar thing (with links to places in the document). could someone please edit these problems? Fwed66 12:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've made a start (fix garbled text/diacritics, summon TOC to top, add wikilinks, add/update stuff) but don't feel like continuing. Wikipeditor 18:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Such is the price of using text from public-domain sources rather than writing it ourselves. Which is to say, I agree. Blech. -- Visviva 15:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Mistake
It must be a mistake - it's impossible that people here usually live more than 70 years and 54 percents are buddhists. It might be a propaganda :/ --86.100.66.70 (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I never got it, too. The figures, albeit by CIA, are either estimates or based on Juche-state's official data. It is highly unlikely to have 72 years (more than in a number of the EU states!) as life expectancy there in real life. It simply doesn't suit with the well-documented facts that millions of people are undernourished there in North Korea (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Percentage_population_undernourished_world_map.PNG). --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
You mean "well documented"?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.115.65.15 (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Famines/Natural Disasters
Why is it that none of the population estimate seem to take into consideration the famines that by some estimates killed as many as 3 million people between 1995 and 1998. Also neglected is the fact that the North Korean population often takes the brunt of natural disasters from floods, mudslides, typhoons and other events due to poor infrastructure, planning and preparations.67.71.31.52 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Wild guess from me is that "famines that by some estimates killed as many as 3 million people between 1995 and 1998" is pure western propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.115.65.15 (talk) 09:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
No discussion of age pyramid/ Famine and Birth control missing
The word "famine" is not mentioned in the article (relating to age group 0-10). Also not mentioned is the birth control policy of the 1970s/80s (relating to age group 25 and older). Another important influence is the Korean war (age group >50).--93.220.28.224 (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Growth Rate Clarification
In the beginning of the article it says: "Since 2000, North Korea's birth rate has exceeded its death rate", implying that the growth rate was negative before and deaths exceeding births, yet later down in the article in the section about growth rate, it actually shows a table that shows that North Korea never experienced negative growth for the time frame available. In fact, before 2000 the growth rate seemed to have been significantly higher while it seems that growth rate is as low as in the 50s and thus a lot less positive than the statement in the introduction makes it sound. Could someone clarify that? 77.9.72.162 (talk) 03:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Demographics of North Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514111837/http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/North_Korea/Final%20national%20census%20report.pdf to http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/North_Korea/Final%20national%20census%20report.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110506065230/http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm to http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514111837/http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/North_Korea/Final%20national%20census%20report.pdf to http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/North_Korea/Final%20national%20census%20report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)