Talk:Demographics of Kerala

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Unnikn in topic Wrong information

migrant labour

edit

migrants from bengal,bihar,up are concentrated in and aroud perumbavoor. population of migrant labours are highest in perumbavoor followed by equal numbered in muvattupuzha,kakkanad and aluva region. it is shocking to see migrant labours slowly penetrating into rural regions in thodupuzha and northern idukki district. it is also true that there are some pockets in south kerala where migrant labours are increasingly seen like chengannur I am told. but not comparable to the number in perumbavoor,muvattupuzha area. 59.93.2.127 (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Have replaced the religion wise population details with data from the official Kerala Govt website as per the 2001 census. I think the data there is more credible than that from ORG survey of 2004. Will231982 15:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Will231982Reply

Languages of Kerala

edit

I need the breakup of linguistic data: How many Hindus speak Malayalam? How many Muslims speak Malayalam? How many Christians speak Malayalam? What is the population of Urdu speakers? What is the population of Hindi speakers? What is the population of Telugu speakers? Please help. Anwar 19:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

There definitely is a Tamil speaking minority in Kerala, I've heard around 4% though —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.67 (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


is it true that many castes in kollam and trivandrum districts are native tamil people who adopted malayalam? is it why the slang sounds like tamil spoken in southern tamilnadu? the castes in questions are nadars,chakkiliyar,mukkuvar etc who are basically tamilians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.2.127 (talk) 15:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

New census website is http://www.censusindia.gov.in - someone should find replacements for the broken links. —Random832 20:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Most populous city versus urban agglomeration

edit
Extended content

According to Census of India 2001,[1] following are the list of Class I Major Towns classified as Urban Agglomerations..

City/Town Population Rank
Kochi 1,355,972 1
Thiruvananthapuram 889,635 2
Kozhikode 880,247 3
Thrissur 498,207 4
Kollam 380,091 5
Kannur 330,122 6
Palakkad 282,675 7
Alappuzha 197,369 8
Kottayam 172,878 9
Malappuram 170,409 10
Cherthala 141,558 11
Guruvayoor 138,681 12
Kasaragod 129,367 13
Vadakara 124,083 14

I removed this table which shows Kochi city as more populous than Trivandrum (contradicts the 2011 census) and replaced it {{Major cities in Kerala}}. Even the source present says Kochi in terms of UA not city. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner Government of India (2001). "Census of India 2001:List of Towns" (PDF): 1–4. Retrieved 2006-01-12. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Demographics of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Demographics of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Synthesis of Aryan and Dravdian

edit

I reverted this edit. The content does not support the Aryan Invasion Theory but only asserts that there is a synthesis. I added one more reference to a book by historian A. Sreedhara Menon. There is no need to go into a discussion that it is a theory here since it was never supported by the text in the first place. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demographics of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wrong information

edit

The article lists some Taluks as having lowest/highest birth rate as per census 2011. This is totally incorrect as census data are not tabulated at this level. In fact, census data on births are unreliable at even state level due to recall lapse and other errors and are not used.

Unnikn (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply