Talk:Demographics of Crimea

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Toddy1 in topic "become to account for"

Are we dealing with the demographics of the AR Crimea or the whole peninsula, including Sevastapol? I suggest the latter is more meaningful these days. PatGallacher (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Religion" section edit

I tried to find some statistics on religion, but nothing so far. All I have seen are general statements like "the Crimean Tatars are Muslim", so, essentially "90% Christian, 10% Muslim", but obviously we need actual statistics (viz., prevalence of non-religion, Christian confessional divisions, etc.). --dab (𒁳) 12:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Crimea became Russia’s very own holy place. [1] Christian priests are being threatened and kidnapped in Crimea by Russian forces [2] [3] [4]. Crimea's Catholics make up around 10 percent [5] and have no legal status according to the article. According to the World Jewish Congress, there are some 15,000 Jews in Crimea [6]. USchick (talk) 16:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
This is interesting. They considered making it a Jewish homeland before Palestine. [7] USchick (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Demographics of Crimea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Demographics of Crimea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

"become to account for" edit

An editor is making the following change from (changed part in bold):[8][9]

exiled Crimean Tatars began returning to their homeland and would become 10% of the population by the beginning of the 21st century

to

exiled Crimean Tatars began returning to their homeland and become to acount for 10% of the population by the beginning of the 21st century.

The "would become" construction is acceptable English. The "become to acount for" construction is not acceptable English.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have alredy agreed with you that such construction isn't used in English, but I can't understand why construction "would become" pointing out future action were applied here. In my opinion we have a deal with action which happened in the past, so we have to use Past Simple tense to express it but not Future-in-the-Past. Sergey Tsvigun (talk) 15:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
The "would become" construction is used to discuss dinosaurs, and they are very much in the past:
  • "But these specimens, fragmentary vertebrae and limb bones, were only the first trickle of what would become a flood of German prosauropods."[10]
  • "prosauropods gave rise to the true sauropods, the familiar long-necked giants that would become the top herbivores for the next 100 million years."[11]
  • 'In later ceratopsians these horns would become enormous structures to complement additional horns on the top of the skull."[12]
  • "He doubted that dinosaurs would become extinct merely because of climatic changes."[13]
  • "Late Triassic dinosaurs were found in the regions that would become Northern Europe"[14]
  • " And who would have imagined it would become possible to figure out the colours of some of the feathered dinosaurs"*[15]
-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply