Talk:Demographics of Bhutan/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
the CIA data is definitely wrong. there is a new census website in bhutan at www.bhutancensus.gov.bt which gives a more uptodate figure.
Um.... i'm pretty sure the population of Bhutan isn't 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.63.136 (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
15% Nepali population needs some rephrasing, though I don't know how. It is not totally correct to say 'ethnic nepali' since there is no such thing. there are the high class brahmins, the lower class ones, then there are those who aren't even hindu, like some of the gurungs, magars, rais etc, as well as the sherpa, tibetan, manangis, tamangs etc. the only thing 'binding' them together in nepal is their common language, which applies less and less in Bhutan as people switch to speaking dzongkha and increasingly English. I think this fact becomes increasingly important to emphasize as Bhutan becoes democratic and some of the bhutan detractors keep on pressing on the 'ethnic ' issues. your use of the term 'ethnic nepali' can play into their game.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Bhutan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211213638/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2054.html to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2054.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120508032703/http://www.health.gov.bt/doph/cdd/update_HIV2010.pdf to http://www.health.gov.bt/doph/cdd/update_HIV2010.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)