Talk:Democratic Union for Consumers

Fair use rationale for Image:Democratic Union logo.png

Image:Democratic Union logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Name

The name of the page should be Democratic Union for the Consumers --Maremmano (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Not a bad idea, although the move is all but necessary in my view. I would ask User:Autospark or anyone else who is an English native speaker whether the new name is correct English. If it is, I won't oppose the move. --Checco (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Either is technically correct, but I prefer without the definitive article as the party name seems to refer to consumers in general, rather than a specific group. Also, an English language source uses the existing article title, so I would leave the article where it is.--Autospark (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok --Maremmano (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

My final thoughts are the following: I do think that Maremmano's proposed name would a more precise translation (the Italian name includes the defintive article and the new name would be consistent e.g. with Federation of the Greens), but either name is OK with me. --Checco (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)